This study is inspired by the works of Sol Lewitt and Rachel Whiteread.
Sol Lewitt built some of his modular structures from open cubes, while Rachel Whiteread created some of her structures by filling the “negative space” in an existing artifact with solid material --- then removing the original artifact.
I saw a relationship
between Lewitt’s Modular Cube and Whiteread’s various negative
space structures.
This study explores
that relationship by first building a modular cube, then emphasizing
the negative space by filling the artifact with material and finally
pulling out the “ghost”.
The resulting form is
reminiscent, in my view, of the negative space structures of Whiteread, in
particular Ghost.
This study began life
simply as a drawing – ink on paper. The colors chosen were a
combination of the white preferred by Lewitt and the yellow often
seen in Whiteread’s drawings.
The study morphed into
a pamphlet, influenced by Lewitt’s Artist’s Books and serial
drawings, showing the construction of, first the cube, then the
ghost, in a form that allowed close inspection, especially of how the
structures could be made.
This video has been
produced from those drawings, telling the story of construction, more
or less as told in the pamphlet .
A final step, yet to be undertaken, is to produce the structures themselves using metal and
plaster.
In an imagined world, a
gallery exhibits all four forms simultaneously, with the drawings on
the wall, the pamphlets available to be handled, the videos showing
in a darkened corner and the structures themselves there to be
observed from any angle
Means of Production
I refer to the original images as drawings, for that is how I think of them.
In practice they are
drafted on paper but ultimately drawn by computer, as scalable
vectors graphics allowing them to be reproduced precisely at any
size.
I don't use a
commercial drawing package. Rather I write code in a
page-description language that generates the vectors directly. This
means I have absolute control over the positioning of lines and the
precise rendering of color.
This method of drawing
is further abstracted by my use of a bespoke “Drawing Language”,
which means that I can envisage the structure and note down this
vision in a few lines. These notes actually translate directly to the
narrative of the video. “Cube, Cube beside Cube, Call it Line, Line
behind Line , Call it Tray, Tray above Tray, Call it Cube, etc.”
Printing of the
individual drawings is accomplished in very high quality using a
Giclee process.
Printing of pamphlets
relies on embedding the drawings in a document description language.
The drawings are precisely scalable to the smaller format required to
appear two-per-A5-page without the loss of definition that comes from
the use of photographs or other images.
The pamphlet shows the
serialization of building the structures.
The video tells the
same story, and uses the same drawings in a stop-frame sequence.
Considerations
I think Lewitt would have liked the language used to describe the structures, since he invented many languages of a similar form himself, not least for describing the (serial) construction of drawings directly on gallery walls and for the enumeration of incomplete cubes.
The language used here
allows enumeration and serialization of structures, which it is clear
was of great interest to Lewitt.
Many of Whiteread’s
drawings, where she is planning for her structures, show a regularity
of form that inspired my observations about the apparent relationship
with the structures of Lewitt.
There is a close
relationship between Art and Architecture as exhibited in the works
of both Lewitt and Whiteread.
Meanwhile, a video is
in production, which describes another of Lewitt’s structures, his
four-sided pyramid.
I see parallels between this, a work of Frank Stella and the Buddhist Temple Borobudur. I am trying various ways of explaining this perceived correspondence, again in a sequence of drawings.
I see parallels between this, a work of Frank Stella and the Buddhist Temple Borobudur. I am trying various ways of explaining this perceived correspondence, again in a sequence of drawings.
Recently completed is a
work inspired by Rothko and O’Keefe, combining the palette of
Rothko with the curves of O’Keefe, showing that this method of
serializing drawings is not restricted to the angular structures used
in this video
Here is an alternative version from vimeo